在中央情報局和國家安全局總部，他們必須真的很享受看在費城蠕動民主黨在維基解密曝光民主黨內部電子郵件的數万。有什麼在情報界發生了一個字：
倒打。
縱觀奧巴馬政府的全部，沒什麼事為維基解密破壞我們的國家安全具有高度機密情報文件的串行洩漏。
當在2010年維基解密公佈的76,000多名秘密情報文件 - 揭露“至少100名阿富汗人的誰被告知塔利班的身份，包括他們的村莊，家庭成員的名字，在塔利班指揮官的人，他們被告知，甚至GPS坐標在哪裡能找到，“我在後寫了 - 什麼也沒有做。
當在2011年發布了維基解密的機密文件寶庫它戲稱為“關塔那摩文件”，在2011 - 包括有關中央情報局的強化審訊計劃的秘密細節 - 什麼也沒有做。
當同年發動維基解密創始人什麼朱利安·阿桑奇稱為“熱核裝置” - 它的全部，比25萬美國秘密外交電報更未編輯檔案 - 什麼也沒有做。
當在2014年發布的維基解密CIA機密文件，揭露中情局特工如何維護蓋，同時通過旅遊機場 - 包括如何生存二次檢查指導 - 什麼也沒有做。
當在2015年維基解密公佈的文件透露，美國政府正在暗中監視其盟國，包括聽音兩方面對三任法國總統的電話 - 什麼也沒有做。
當在2016年出版的維基解密歐盟軍事行動的秘密細節攔截的難民船沿與伊斯蘭國恐怖分子出沒利比亞海岸地區前往歐洲，什麼也沒有做。
當在2016年維基解密曝光描述外國政府通訊截取國家安全局絕密文件 - 包括聯合國秘書長潘基文和德國總理默克爾之間在柏林的私人氣候變化戰略會議 - 什麼也沒有做。
但維基解密終於越過“紅線”（雙關語意）已經贏得了民主黨的憤怒。民主黨全國委員會 - 定位，而不是中情局或國家安全局的，維基解密組織民主黨人真正關心後消失。
維基解密發布的電子郵件顯示，幾萬，而初選期間本身表現為一個公正的仲裁者，在DNC，事實上，代表希拉里·克林頓的加班破壞參議員伯尼·桑德斯（I-佛蒙特州）。在一個洩露的電子郵件，DNC官員說，他們計劃暴露桑德斯與在肯塔基州和西弗吉尼亞州浸信會選民無神論者。其他表現DNC員工嘲諷桑德斯的支持者為“伯尼兄弟”，並密謀如何旋轉他失敗的故事。其他人透露該DNC和希拉里的勝利顯然是基金通過國家民主黨派渠道的錢，也許就在努力避免的貢獻限制她的競選。其他洩漏包括電子表格出現過一次克林頓被選為民主黨捐助者和募捐任用相匹配聯邦議會和佣金。還有一些顯示DNC工作人員把他們的捐助者“小丑”有為有一個“坐在[S - EST]角球開我能找到”在DNC事件。在費城公約已被揭露，從而導致眾議員黛比·沃瑟曼·舒爾茨（D-佛羅里達州）辭去主席攪亂。
民主黨有沒有人責怪，但自己對這次崩潰。正如我在郵報指出，2010年8月，有奧巴馬政府可以採取停止維基解密的許多步驟。它可能被起訴阿桑奇和他的維基解密同事和工作人員明確表示，美國不會容忍任何國家 - 特別是北約盟國 - 為他們提供一個避風港。他們可以尋求引渡和 - 如果他們在那裡躲藏拒絕國家進行合作 - 使用現有的司法部當局逮捕任何地方他們在世界上，不管有沒有這些國家的同意。他們可以使用美國網絡司令部的資產開展維基解密服務器的網絡攻擊，以破壞其傳播機密信息使生命處於危險之中的能力。
但現在看來，政府已經做沒有這些東西。 2013年，郵政reportedthat“司法部已全部結束不會起訴維基解密創始人朱利安·阿桑奇指控發布機密文件，因為政府的律師說還沒有起訴美國新聞機構和記者，他們不能這樣做。 。 。除非他被牽連的犯罪活動比在網上發布絕密的軍事和外交文件等。“真的？
至於用我們國家的進攻網絡能力破壞維基解密的傳播機密信息的能力，這顯然並沒有發生。為了這一天，維基解密的被竊取的機密文件的整個存檔仍然可以在其網站上對任何人閱讀。
現在，民主黨正在為奧巴馬的無所作為的代價。維基解密和承諾有更多的驚喜。在接受CNN在本週接受採訪時，阿桑奇說，他可能很快就會釋放“了很多材料。”這應該有民主黨人嚇壞了。
顯然，暴露情報來源和方法還沒有足夠要緊的奧巴馬政府做一些事情維基解密。也許進一步節省尷尬希拉里·克林頓，或者更糟，將最終促使他們採取行動。
Over at the CIA and the National Security Agency headquarters, they must be really enjoying watching Democrats in Philadelphia squirm over WikiLeaks’s exposure of tens of thousands of internal Democratic Party emails. There’s a word for what is happening in the intelligence community:
Blowback.
Throughout the entirety of the Obama administration, nothing was done as WikiLeaks damaged our national security with its serial leaks of highly classified intelligence documents.
When in 2010 WikiLeaks released more than 76,000 secret intelligence documents — exposing“the identities of at least 100 Afghans who were informing on the Taliban, including the names of their villages, family members, the Taliban commanders on whom they were informing, and even GPS coordinates where they could be found,” as I wrote in The Post — nothing was done.
When in 2011 WikiLeaks released a trove of classified documents it dubbed the “Gitmo Files” in 2011 — including secret details about the CIA’s enhanced interrogation program – nothing was done.
When that same year WikiLeaks unleashed what founder Julian Assange called a “thermonuclear device” — its full, unredacted archive of more than a quarter-million secret U.S. diplomatic cables — nothing was done.
When in 2014 WikiLeaks released classified CIA documents exposing how CIA operatives maintain cover while traveling through airports — including guidance on how to survive secondary screening — nothing was done.
When in 2015 WikiLeaks released documents revealing that the U.S. government was spying on its allies, including listening in on the phone calls of three French presidents — nothing was done.
When in 2016 WikiLeaks published secret details of European Union military operations to intercept refugee boats traveling to Europe from the regions along the Libyan coast infested with terrorists from the Islamic State, nothing was done.
When in 2016 WikiLeaks exposed top-secret documents describing NSA intercepts of foreign government communications — including a private climate-change strategy meeting between United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Berlin — nothing was done.
But WikiLeaks has finally crossed a “red line” (pun intended) that has earned it the Democrats’ outrage. Instead of targeting the CIA or the NSA, WikiLeaks has gone after an organization Democrats actually care about — the Democratic National Committee.
WikiLeaks has released tens of thousands of emails showing that, while presenting itself as an impartial arbiter during the primaries, the DNC was, in fact, working overtime on Hillary Clinton’s behalf to undermine Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). In one leaked email, DNC officials said they planned to expose Sanders as an atheist with Baptist voters in Kentucky and West Virginia. Others showed DNC staffers mocking Sanders supporters as “Bernie Bros” and plotting how to spin the narrative of his failure. Others reveal that the DNC and the Hillary Victory Fund apparently channeled money through state Democratic parties, perhaps in an effort to avoid contribution limits to her campaign. Other leaks include spreadsheets that appeared to match Democratic donors and fundraisers with appointments to federal boards and commissions once Clinton was elected. Still others show DNC staffers calling their donors “clowns” and promising to have one “sitting in the [s-est] corner I can find” at a DNC event. The convention in Philadelphia has been roiled by the revelations, which caused Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) to step down as chair.
Democrats have no one to blame but themselves for this debacle. As I pointed out in The Post on August 2010, there were many steps the Obama administration could have taken to stop WikiLeaks. It could have indicted Assange and his fellow WikiLeaks staffers and made clear that the United States will not tolerate any country — particularly NATO allies — providing them with a haven. They could have sought their extradition and — if the countries where they were hiding refused to cooperate — used existing Justice Department authorities to arrest them anywhere in the world, with or without those countries’ consent. They could have used the assets of U.S. Cyber Command to carry out cyberattacks on WikiLeaks servers to disrupt its ability to disseminate classified information that puts lives at risk.
But it appears that the administration has done none of these things. In 2013, The Post reportedthat “The Justice Department has all but concluded it will not bring charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for publishing classified documents because government lawyers said they could not do so without also prosecuting U.S. news organizations and journalists . . . unless he is implicated in criminal activity other than releasing online top-secret military and diplomatic documents.” Seriously?
As for using our nation’s offensive cyber capabilities to disrupt WikiLeaks’s ability to disseminate classified information, that clearly has not happened. To this day, WikiLeaks’s entire archive of stolen classified documents remains available on its website for anyone to read.
Now Democrats are paying the price for Obama’s inaction. And WikiLeaks promises there is more to come. In an interview with CNN this week, Assange said he might soon release “a lot more material.” That should have Democrats terrified.
Apparently, exposing intelligence sources and methods has not mattered enough for the Obama administration to do something about WikiLeaks. Maybe saving Hillary Clinton from further embarrassment, or worse, will finally spur them to action.
